Nasa use case yan.
If you're gunning for the best tone, individual pedals are the best. If you're gunning for practicality, multi effects hold good ground.
Multi-effects have come a long way since they came into mainstream use in the 90s. The DSP is better, and there are amp sims. Modulation effects have always been a strong point of digital effects (because, how hard can it be, it's effing digital). But is this something you'd bring to a recording session or a concert? I don't think so. But it's a great thing to have on bar gigs. Even big-name (gringo) musicians have multi effects to lug around for when the afterparties come up on random bars.
That being said, individual pedals have signature sounds, and of course the quality is better, especially for analog pedals which is about as pure as you can get in terms of modifying signals. Think about it this way, people fight over the sound of different releases of the same exact pedal (ProCo RAT, Danelectro Transparent OD, Boss DS-1) like how drummers fight over which vintage of Zildjian New Beats sounded best. That's the level of nuance you get with individual pedals. But with a sizable pedalboard, is it something practical to lug around? If you don't have a car or roadies, it can be quite tough. A blues pedalboard is not a bother at all, but if I had to make a pedalboard that does what my multi effects does for me now? I'd probably need a chiropractor.
In the end, right now it's a choice between sound and practicality. And proof of that is multi effects living snugly in a pedalboard among individual pedals. tons of G3s and MS50Gs alongside wamplers and Bosses.
Personally, sure I'd love top notch sound, but to get the sound I get from my multi effects now, I'd have to spend tons of good money on individual pedals and probably a pedalswitcher/patchbay. Mahal kaya ang TC!