I think my argument is simple:
I have NOTHING to gain by telling you that only 1-2% of guitars sound great AND that you have to go thru ALL brands to find one. Why? I don't own any Signature Guitar. I am NOT sponsored by any brand. I do not own any musical instrument store nor am I a dealer of musical instruments. Wala akong banda o gig na for promotion.
All I am saying is what you ALL ALREADY know -- na pinipili ang gitara. Ang sinasabi ko lang ay dapat mas mahigpit kayo pumili para hindi kayo lokohin ng mga nagbebenta.
If I am wrong, then you have nothing to lose.
But if I am right, then you have all to gain because I can teach you how to find a great sounding guitar. But it comes at a price... you sometimes have to give up specifications, preferences and looks. On the other hand, sometimes these great guitars are beautiful in their own right that you had never thought about -- like my recently acquired Suhr Carve Top with a beautiful top chosen and speced out by no less than John Suhr (less than a month ago). Or as Strange a shape as the Albert Lee Model (acquired last week). Maybe, nothing closer to Van Halen than the Axis Sport (acquired last week). Maybe something unique and one off as the Fender NAMM Butternut Tele (acquired two weeks ago). Or maybe revisiting the possibility of a signature model that sounds great today -- the Fender SRV (acquired three weeks ago).
In a world where I am NOT limited by anything other than location, am I NOT the least biased to select a guitar? Compared to Skybox, who would you bet on to choose a better guitar?