What is your stand about Homosexuality?

[MrGobots]

^ ayun yon e...

[Bolt Thrower]

Yes, because because gender differences are all just social constructs that we all need to get out of, right?
For a "straight" guy, you seem to be very passionate about shoving your gay "facts" down our throats.

Unless you can present a counter argument that homosexuality is a sickness, then I'd be happy to offend your sensibilities.

Hey, how about a bit of trivia about Alfred Kinsey:
*(Robinson in Reisman, Dr. Judith A., and Eichel, Edward W. Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People. Lafayette, Louisiana, Huntington House, 1990, 1992:204.)

A very just & noble cause by the "Father of the Sexual Revolution" Here's more from this guy & his cohorts:
*(Ebert, Michael. “Pedophilia Steps into the Daylight;” Focus on the Family Citizen. November 16, 1992 Pg. 6f.)

LOL at these perverts masquerading as "scientists". I just pity the folks who hold these guys' studies in high regard & worship them as "facts".

Yeah. LOL at these pervert scientists says the guy who digs some incest. 

Nagbo-browse ako ng incest porn tapos bigla na lang ako napadpad dito. Weird. 

Don't read Plato. He sucked little Greek d1cks for breakfast.

[Santo Muerte]

Unless you can present a counter argument that homosexuality is a sickness, then I'd be happy to offend your sensibilities.

I've already reiterated many times that homosexuality is a deviation from nature's inherent design to propagate itself, but I think I have already proven that you're not that receptive to real facts.

Nagbo-browse ako ng incest porn tapos bigla na lang ako napadpad dito. Weird. 

Yeah. LOL at these pervert scientists says the guy who digs some incest. 

Oh really now? Digging up my old posts & using my own fetish against me instead of putting out a counter-argument against what I've thrown at Kinsey? At least ang sa akin hanggang pantasya lang & I'm not some pseudo-scientist disguising my sick perversion as "science". Alright, I apologize. I'm sorry for completely destroying your idol Alfred Kinsey's credibility. Judging from how you responded it seems that I've struck a nerve. Happy now?

You stooping this low means that I've probably won this little debate. I expected better.

Heterosexuals = 1, Homosexuals = 0

Don't read Plato. He sucked little Greek d1cks for breakfast.

Well, at least hindi mo na kailangang aminin na "normal" rin ang tingin mo sa pederasty because you've impled that since Plato is doing it, why can't we too?

Why am I not surprised?

[Santo Muerte]

Mr. Thrower, there's nothing wrong with admitting you're gay. Nasa modern times na tayo & I'm sure na most people won't discriminate since they're more open minded. Besides, pwede namang malunasan iyan e, just look at this guy right here:



See how happy he is now that he has found his true purpose in life after being cured?

[gandydancer123]

YAY! Makakajoin na ako!

[ysei]

Awwww yeaaaahh!

[gandydancer123]

Awwww yeaaaahh!

WOHOOO!!

[pixelwise]

welcome back mga pasaway

[lennon12]

ang pagbabalik hehe

[lennon12]

nyay..

nalipat lang pala tong thread haha 

[gandydancer123]

http://talk.philmusic.com/index.php?topic=292404.0;topicseen

GUYS MANHUNT MUNA SA PHILMUSIC..

May scammer on the loose na tumalo kay TechBp..

kailangang kalampagin Philmusic..

[ysei]

http://talk.philmusic.com/index.php?topic=292404.0;topicseen

GUYS MANHUNT MUNA SA PHILMUSIC..

May scammer on the loose na tumalo kay TechBp..

kailangang kalampagin Philmusic..

Gusto kong mag comment dyan eh...sakit nun 27k!

Teka Gandy OT nanaman tayo hahaha...

[Bolt Thrower]

I've already reiterated many times that homosexuality is a deviation from nature's inherent design to propagate itself, but I think I have already proven that you're not that receptive to real facts.

Inherent design? No anal sex M-F for you then? Cumming on the face?

Oh really now? Digging up my old posts & using my own fetish against me instead of putting out a counter-argument against what I've thrown at Kinsey? At least ang sa akin hanggang pantasya lang & I'm not some pseudo-scientist disguising my sick perversion as "science". Alright, I apologize. I'm sorry for completely destroying your idol Alfred Kinsey's credibility. Judging from how you responded it seems that I've struck a nerve. Happy now?

You stooping this low means that I've probably won this little debate. I expected better.

Ok lang yan. Some societies consider Incest ok. Lipat ka doon. Di mo lang ma act out yung fantasy mo kasi taboo. Alfred Kinsey is alright with me. What we know about human female orgasm is due to his research. If they said that pederasty is ok, it is a historical perspective. The greeks didn't revile it like we do now. It was valued in diff rent societies actually. Totoo naman sinabi nila. Puwede naman maging genuine, loving relationshipp ang ganoon. Nandidiri ka lang kaya di mo matanggap. Ayaw mo ng ganyan, pero ok lang sa iyo incest fantasy. lol Ok lang yan, lahat ng tao may "quirks".

Without Kinsey and co. Sodomy across different US States would still be illegal. No Anabolic Assman pron for us.   

If the science is sound and substatiated, kahit sino pa magsabi niyan ayos na ayos kahit lola niya kinakant0t niya in real life. Kapag authority figures hanap mo at tinitingnan mo reputation, tawag doon APPEAL TO AUTHORITY.

Go for the evidence, not the people. 

Well, at least hindi mo na kailangang aminin na "normal" rin ang tingin mo sa pederasty because you've impled that since Plato is doing it, why can't we too?

Why am I not surprised?

E kung normal sa society nila yun, ano magagawa mo? Go Taliban on them? Kultura nila yun e. I didn't say it was bad. I'm ok with Da Vinci or Shakespeare being gay too. Or Benjamin Franklin banging old wh0res. Doesn't exactly diminish what they have done.

At tsaka wala ako inimlpy na gawin mo din kasi ginagawa niya. LOL! Sabi ko lang wag ka magbasa ng Plato kasi mukang ayaw mo ng pederasty same as ayaw mo ng Kinsey kasi ok lang sa kanila yun.

Reading comprehension pre. O high lang? 

Mr. Thrower, there's nothing wrong with admitting you're gay. Nasa modern times na tayo & I'm sure na most people won't discriminate since they're more open minded. Besides, pwede namang malunasan iyan e, just look at this guy right here:



See how happy he is now that he has found his true purpose in life after being cured?

Hahahaha with that picture I doubt he has become straight. Ngiti pa lang e. 

[Bolt Thrower]

At bakit nandito ito? Hahaha! Wala naman nagbabasa ng sub forum na ito! Hahahaha

Puwede na kayo makigulo Gandy at Ysei!

[Riff_6603]

At bakit nandito ito? Hahaha! Wala naman nagbabasa ng sub forum na ito! Hahahaha

Exactly the point kaya ni-move yung thread dito!

Kidding aside, pasok pa din sa KKK yung topic instead of being just an AGT type thread.

Puwede na kayo makigulo Gandy at Ysei!

I trust that Gandy and Ysei would behave given their current "situation" lest we suspend them from KKK too!

[ysei]

Exactly the point kaya ni-move yung thread dito!

Kidding aside, pasok pa din sa KKK yung topic instead of being just an AGT type thread.

I trust that Gandy and Ysei would behave given their current "situation" lest we suspend them from KKK too!

Wag naman Sir Chief! 

[gandydancer123]

Exactly the point kaya ni-move yung thread dito!

Kidding aside, pasok pa din sa KKK yung topic instead of being just an AGT type thread.

I trust that Gandy and Ysei would behave given their current "situation" lest we suspend them from KKK too!

hahaha

first may AGT...then may RATS...ngayon KKK na..awesome!

[mozart123]

[Bolt Thrower]

Exactly the point kaya ni-move yung thread dito!

Kidding aside, pasok pa din sa KKK yung topic instead of being just an AGT type thread.

I trust that Gandy and Ysei would behave given their current "situation" lest we suspend them from KKK too!

hahahaha "kakisigan"! up the irons!

[guitarwiz02]

So boss, paano naging mother of all scales yun kung yung iba nga di related sa Kinsey? Saan mo nakuha na doon nanggaling at nag originate mga yan?

Well, alright, that was just my assumption from the fact that he popularized such measure or scale. That really doesn't hurt anyway, does it? But just the same, mother of all such scales or not, it still doesn't prove anything aside from the fact that it's just an idea.

Lol di mo naman kailangan kausapin. Titingnan mo lang kung may statistic nga na ganon. Bakit mo kakausapin? Curious ka? May itatanong ka na medyo awkward? hahahaha

To verify first-hand. You've been deflecting the challenge from the get-go 'coz you really got nothing. What a shame, really. It seems that, whichever thread you choose to participate in, you always fail. Awkward? Me? Ha ha! The feeling of awkwardness actually lies on you. Yer just too damn scared to reveal yer true sexual orientation. Reason being why you keep your amigas from being, shall I say, interviewed. 

Huwag ka na. Gusto mo lang ng kuwentong lesbyana na galing sa straight e.

Kwentong lesbiyana is perfectly fine. Lesbians, after all, are still of the female or opposite sex breed. You, on the other hand, are obviously fond of "kwentong bak.la." Now, that's disturbing. Unless you come-out in the open.

Dami dami straight diyan na nagka homo experience pero straight. Madali lang maghanap.

Gay. So, where are your amigas, then?

Mga tunay na tao din yang nasa Google, huwag ka mag alala. Puwede mo sila i-email sa mga blog nila. May statistics. May findings. Hindi mo na nga kailangan kausapin. You just have to verify they exist. Physical proof pa rin yan. Kaso tamad ka.

Mas madali pa nga i-google ang proof kesa sayangin ko pa oras ko na pakiusap sa iyo. Dami dami ganyan sa mundo. Which I can't say about your god na kahit census statistic wala. hahaha

 

So, by this, you agree that The Bible is considered as physical proof? Nice! Anyway, this is already an indication that you don't know where to go from here. Since you've ducked my challenge more than a couple of times and you can't seem to prove your ridiculous claim, you've once again pulled God into the mix to deviate the topic. Classy.
 

Sige 'te!

Okay, 'te!

[Bolt Thrower]

Well, alright, that was just my assumption from the fact that he popularized such measure or scale. That really doesn't hurt anyway, does it? But just the same, mother of all such scales or not, it still doesn't prove anything aside from the fact that it's just an idea.

proves that there is a statistic that belongs to the gradients.

To verify first-hand. You've been deflecting the challenge from the get-go 'coz you really got nothing. What a shame, really. It seems that, whichever thread you choose to participate in, you always fail. Awkward? Me? Ha ha! The feeling of awkwardness actually lies on you. Yer just too damn scared to reveal yer true sexual orientation. Reason being why you keep your amigas from being, shall I say, interviewed. 

You can still verify first hand. Totoo pa rin naman yung mga taong nasa Google, yung mga nasa Yahoo Answers at yung mga nasa ibang forums. Sasagot din naman yan pag kinausap mo. Hahaha tamad ka lang.

Sa dinami mo na-type, may mahahanap ka na.   

Kwentong lesbiyana is perfectly fine. Lesbians, after all, are still of the female or opposite sex breed. You, on the other hand, are obviously fond of "kwentong bak.la." Now, that's disturbing. Unless you come-out in the open.

All this insinuation that I'm gay because I'm a gay symphatizer is ooooooooooold. And a double standard rears its ugly head. You are ok with lesbians but gays are an upfront to your masculinity? Insecure?   

So, by this, you agree that The Bible is considered as physical proof? Nice! Anyway, this is already an indication that you don't know where to go from here. Since you've ducked my challenge more than a couple of times and you can't seem to prove your ridiculous claim, you've once again pulled God into the mix to deviate the topic. Classy.
 

The bible is physical proof that humans wrote it. Not of god, or whatever magic unicorns you have. 

Anyway, I didn't duck your challenge of giving proof. I just refused letting some people meet you. Knowing na ka-chismoso mong tao, mas chismos ka pa sa parlor g@y. Malamang di ko sila papakilala sa iyo babae pa man din. Mukha ka pa manyakis na walang chicks o desperado sa babae. Call ko na yun na di sila pakilala sa iyo. hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Asa ka pa brad. 

But I gave you other avenues to get to your inquiry. That's still me giving proof. Call it what you will. Tamad ka lang maghanap.

Dami tao oh. Kausapin mo isat isa. Email mo. Webcam kayo. Hanap. Usap. Deal!
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080702084010AAN1dEw


Tao pa rin yan. hahahaha!

And statistics:

In 2003, Pathela's team performed telephone interviews with nearly 4,200 New York City men. They conducted the interviews in English, Spanish, Chinese, and Russian; a translation service helped with interviews in Greek, Korean, Yiddish, Polish, and Haitian Creole.

In nearly every study of sexual behavior, the percentage of men who report sex with men is higher than the percentage of men who report being gay.

So Pathela and colleagues first asked the men if they were bisexual, gay, or straight. Then they asked about specific sexual behaviors.

Some of the findings:

    Straight-identified men who have sex with men report fewer sex partners than gay men.
    Straight-identified men who have sex with men report fewer STDs in the past year than gay men.
    Straight-identified men who have sex with men are less likely than gay men to report using a condom during their last sexual encounter.
    Straight-identified men who have sex with men are more likely to be foreign born than gay men.

Also, a man who says he is straight but is having sex with other men is more likely to be married than a straight man who has sex with women, according to the survey. Only 54% of the men who say they're straight and have sex with women are married, compared with the 70% marriage rate among the men who say they're straight but have sex with men.

http://www.webmd.com/sex/news/20060918/many-straight-men-have-gay-sex

Kitams. 2 minutes lang sa google 'te, may 20+ people for interview ka na at may statistics ka pa.

Anong mahirap doon? 

[Santo Muerte]

http://www.webmd.com/sex/news/20060918/many-straight-men-have-gay-sex

Kitams. 2 minutes lang sa google 'te, may 20+ people for interview ka na at may statistics ka pa.

Anong mahirap doon? 

Sometimes these "studies" are just too damn funny. What next, "More women ages 18-26 have sex with Rottweilers than with men"?

But then again, it was conducted in New York.

[guitarwiz02]

proves that there is a statistic that belongs to the gradients.

Inaccurate stats, that is. Still far from proving your claim.

You can still verify first hand. Totoo pa rin naman yung mga taong nasa Google, yung mga nasa Yahoo Answers at yung mga nasa ibang forums. Sasagot din naman yan pag kinausap mo. Hahaha tamad ka lang.

Sa dinami mo na-type, may mahahanap ka na.

You're missing the point here. Either that, or you really do have nothing in your pocket. You've been making a fool of yourself these past couple of pages by presenting unreliable, non-credible and highly likely, unverifiable data/ proofs from the net while you claim you have "actual" friends that can "actually" prove your claim and disprove mine. That sounds ducking to me.

All this insinuation that I'm gay because I'm a gay symphatizer is ooooooooooold. And a double standard rears its ugly head. You are ok with lesbians but gays are an upfront to your masculinity? Insecure?

So old? So, you're used to being called gay? Nice. That says a lot about your true persona, y'know.

Again, you missed the message. It's okay to talk about lesbians 'coz they are, after all, still women. And women are for us (excluding you) men and vice-versa. Which, is totally normal. But yer different. You prefer stories about gay men. Eeewwww!

God created Adam and Eve, y'know. Not Adam and Steve.

The bible is physical proof that humans wrote it. Not of god, or whatever magic unicorns you have.

Also a physical proof of His existence.

Anyway, I didn't duck your challenge of giving proof. I just refused letting some people meet you. Knowing na ka-chismoso mong tao, mas chismos ka pa sa parlor g@y. Malamang di ko sila papakilala sa iyo babae pa man din. Mukha ka pa manyakis na walang chicks o desperado sa babae. Call ko na yun na di sila pakilala sa iyo. hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Asa ka pa brad. 

But I gave you other avenues to get to your inquiry. That's still me giving proof. Call it what you will. Tamad ka lang maghanap.

Dami tao oh. Kausapin mo isat isa. Email mo. Webcam kayo. Hanap. Usap. Deal!
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080702084010AAN1dEw


Tao pa rin yan. hahahaha!

And statistics:

http://www.webmd.com/sex/news/20060918/many-straight-men-have-gay-sex

Kitams. 2 minutes lang sa google 'te, may 20+ people for interview ka na at may statistics ka pa.

Anong mahirap doon? 

Ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ako? Ako ang desperado at walang chicks? Tena, sobrang napatawa ako dun ah. Apir! Ha ha! Pwede ba, 'wag mo ako itulad sa sarili mo, 'te. E obvious naman sa lahat ng nakakabasa dito na ikaw ang walang chicks, e panay bak.la ang kasama mo e. Hotdog at itlog kasi ang hanap mo e no? Ha ha! Alam ba sa inyo yan? O may napagmanahan? 

Wait, everything you said still sounds ducking to me.

[guitarwiz02]

Sometimes these "studies" are just too damn funny. What next, "More women ages 18-26 have sex with Rottweilers than with men"?

But then again, it was conducted in New York.

Ha ha ha! Men that fu.ck men are still straight! Ha ha! Wooohooo!

[Santo Muerte]

All this insinuation that I'm gay because I'm a gay symphatizer is ooooooooooold. And a double standard rears its ugly head. You are ok with lesbians but gays are an upfront to your masculinity? Insecure?   

It's "affront". You're welcome.