In my last letter, I claimed that our real enemy is the spineless system that made PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan as ignorant as it is, and that claim is even more true now. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of view or vice versa, I intend to argue that PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan occasionally writes letters accusing me and my friends of being disloyal, fatuitous evil-doers. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is doubtless the language in which PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan habitually thinks) and serve no purpose other than to convince me that the problem with it is not that it's witless. It's that it wants to shatter other people's lives and dreams. Revisionism represents a self-pitying, destructive form of divide-and-conquer. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan tried to cripple its enemies politically, economically, socially, morally, and psychologically.
Quite simply, PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan's thralls are merely liars with charisma. For proof of this fact, I must point out that PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan claims that I'm too disorganized to resolve a number of lingering problems. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another amoral attempt to shower rummy know-nothings with undeserved encomia. Many experts now believe that in asserting that if it kicks us in the teeth, we'll then lick its toes and beg for another kick, it demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. After watching PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan's satraps talk about you and me in terms which are not fit to be repeated, one might conclude that PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan et al. would lay out their own ideas of philosophical pedagogy, textual interpretation, and moral philosophy. Surprisingly, nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan pompously claims that character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization". That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately.
Don't let yourself be persuaded by pestilential, postmodernist recidivists who secretly want to fund a vast web of subversive, longiloquent saboteurs, antisocial, maledicent nebbishes, and irascible headcases of one sort or another. I have a message for PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan. My message is that, for the good of us all, it should never defend Bonapartism, nihilism, and notions of racial superiority. It should never even try to do such a crude thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by "never", I don't mean "maybe", "sometimes", or "it depends". I mean only that if history follows its course, it should be evident that PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan's intent is to prevent us from asking questions. It doesn't want the details checked. It doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts it presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of its "facts" are false. PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan is extremely litigious. In fact, let's see what my Litigious-O-Meter has to say about it. Whoa! The needle is off the scale! It's a good thing I checked, because PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan wants to pollute the great canon of English literature with references to its peremptory scare tactics. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. There is an open consensus that PEDALS na certified pang-mabibigat na tugtugan's officious past resonates in its current prophecies. That's all I have to say. Thank you for reading this letter.
.png "lol")
http://www.pakin.org/complaint 
