Sige na nga, kunyari na lang matalino ka at alam mo yung pinagsasabi mo and indulge you with another response, disregarding your obvious cop-outs.
Like it or not it is true. Your genitals ultimately means nothing to your sexual preference and gender identity.
Ultimately though, however ultimately you've already put it, whichever gender you identify with, your genitalia will define what kind of sexual relations you have as it is the main tool for sexual activity. How hard was that to grasp?
Let me see if you can actually grasp the idea. There are only 2 biological genders, Male and Female. If a male chooses to identify as a female, does he become homosexual? Not yet. Depending on culture and environment, the idea of what a female's identity/lifestyle will vary. Only when he becomes romantically attracted, sexually attracted and/or engage in sexual activity wiht another male does he become homosexual or he does a homosexual act. Sexual preference is defined by which direction your sexual interest is homo, hetero or bi. Regardless of which, sexual activity will always involve genitalia. Sexual preference defines sexual activity. See? o di wala rin na naman yung punto mo?
Consequently, if a man has intercourse with a woman, it doesn't mean he is not gay or bisexual. Similarly, a transexual man, can have intercourse with a transexual woman yet their gay gender identities are still intact while copulating the same as any man and woman.
Cop out. If a man has intercourse with a woman, it doesn't mean he is not gay or bisexual. True, It does say he had heterosexual intercourse, regardless of which gender both of them identify with.
Just so we're on the same page, homosexuality is homosexuality. A man identifying himself as a woman doesn't mean he is automatically homosexual.Unless that's what you have been thinking all along then ang babaw pala ng pseudo-scientific analytical na pagiisip mo. Only when he engages in homosexuality does it make him homosexual.
And just to make it clear, sexual preference is not the same as gender identity and sex as you have put.
akala ko ba matalino ka? where did I say sexual preference is the same as gender identity and sex? or are you just being consistent as to twist what I say to mean something else just to win an argument? luma na yan
Gender identity is the gender you identify with regardless if you have a vagina, a penis or both, or none. Of course you can't choose your sex, you are born with it. Sexual preference is second fiddle to your gender identity also regardless of your sex. See the difference Einstein?
Call me Uncle Bob na lang, I called you Einstein first e. Einstein, you are confusing gender identity with gender role.
The genitals are there. It gives society a basis for your sexual role in society, but ultimately won't mean anything when one comes to terms with his gender identity.
sabi ko na e. Gender identity and gender role is different. Sex (meaning intercourse) always involves genitals.
No. Obviously, bestiality is a whole different matter. A US Marine stationed in Afghanistan can have sex with a female goat but he doesn't identify as a male goat. Someone who fvcks dogs can identify as straight, bisexual or homosexual but doesn't identify himself to be canine.
Sure but its not just US Marines in Afghanistan that engage in this act. Lets say he has intercourse with just dogs and he prefers this sexual activity over straight, bi nor homosexual activity. A pure zoophiliac. Lets throw that in the conversation so we can "progress" the way you want to progress
It is a whole different topic, and is immaterial to the discussion of homosexuality or LGBT rights. Furthering my assessment that you view gender identity as a consequence of your sexual activity which is a very old and discarded model.
It is a whole different topic, yes. That is why I want to throw that in the conversation. Since you think progress means granting unconditional acceptance to gender identity, lets take that a step further and speed progress up a notch by starting discussions on Species Identity. Inter-species intercourse occurs in nature and is perfectly natural, how does that not differ from your arguments on homosexuality?
I see that your views are still beholden to past orthodoxies, stereotypes and old caricatures of the human sexual continuum. I suggest exposing yourself more to newer data that could further flesh out your understanding of the subject. It might also help to reconcile where this display of passive bigotry or uneasiness comes from through psychiatric help or evaluation.
Well, we have seen your deficiency in comprehension and reason, I wouldn't trust your assessments let alone any of your recommendations.
Learn more. People only fear what they don't understand.
Suuuuure. We have just seen how poor your arguments are based on the data you're exposed to, against that I would consider I have learned enough.
