Irrational? So you think mankind would have lasted 20,000 years if they'd copulated with the same sex? Genius? No. Common sense? Yes.
Yes. Irrational. Because for the millions of years of homosexuality present in mankind, the variation never exceeded 20% of the population same as every other species. Not every human is homosexual and the variation stays uniform across generations. It's the same as left handed people, their population stays the same. So yes, mankind will exist and survive the same even if more homosexuals came out.
Gays also have the capacity to donate sperm to females who have no sex partners who want children, so is that other chance. Test tube babies have good chances of being twins. Better numbers.
Humans pass on their genetic information to their offspring, this includes their strongest traits (better resistance to some diseases, etc) & unfortunately, also their weak traits. The resulting offspring would have the strongest traits of both the parents, ensuring better chances survival. Tell me, how is this possible in a homosexual setting?
Again, not everyone is homosexual and there is no chance humanity will become all homosexual. Sexual orientation is a variation of human sexuality not a deviation with erratic statistics. So this fear of this doomsday scenario is irrational. Offspring with better chances of survival will continue to exist. Homosexuals have the capacity to bear children too. We have lesbians who impregnate themselves by other means.
News flash, there is still no "gay gene". There is still no proof that people are born gay.
Newsflash. I never said there is a gay gene. Pre-disposition is what i said. No body is born left handed but are only pre disposed to it. That is why I listed the common factors that might "influence" the variation. And if the child is predisposed there is no telling he will be JUST gay, he can become asexual, trisexual, bisexual or agender. Like genius as a matter of nature and nurture, a child can be pre disposed to high levels of IQ but there is no telling what kind of genius he will become. Yet having two high IQ parents don't mean the resulting offspring is genius too. If it was a matter of gene, we would know when and how the variation will occur like baldness, colorblindness or eye color.
A family of 3 generations of straight people will have a gay child following the variation statistic. So, say if you slaughter ALL homosexuals and all humanity is purely straight in population, the succeeding generation will always spawn a certain percentage of gay children.
And yes, sexual preference is not a choice. Did you choose during in grade school who your crush is? Dave or Anna? No. It just happened you were curious about Anna even if your patotoy is not yet capable of erecting or making sense of these emotions.
So, if psychology is a pseudoscience, and homosexuality is psychological, where does that leave homosexuality?
Hey! That reply was intended for Spetznaz. I certainly don't think psychology is a pseudoscience nor homosexuality is purely a psychological phenomenon.
question. bakit tinawag na homo erectus ang mga homo erectus ?
homo means man in latin. homo erectus=upright/standing man.
homo(s) means
the same in greek. so there is that homo in the word homosexual.
