Sige na nga, kunyari na lang matalino ka at alam mo yung pinagsasabi mo and indulge you with another response, disregarding your obvious cop-outs.
Ultimately though, however ultimately you've already put it, whichever gender you identify with, your genitalia will define what kind of sexual relations you have as it is the main tool for sexual activity. How hard was that to grasp?
Nababawan ako sa definition. Sounds too restrictive. One can form a sexual preference without the use of or referring to one's genitals.
The mechanics of sexual orientation transcend how people want to use their genitals.
It's not just...
"Saan ko gusto ipasok itong [sausage] ko?"
"Sino gusto ko makatalik"
Whether one has a penis, vagina or both or none at all, one can still form a sexual preference. If you are born with a penis it doesn't mean that your sexual preference revolves around your penis and how you want to use it. Some gays don't use their penises because they want to be seen and treated as women without going to the extent of being transexual and putting a vagina in there and cutting out the penis. Some lesbians don't even acknowledge they have a vagina and think that they are just trapped in a man's body, so much as they form their sexual preference without referring to their inborn sex organs. Some homosexuals are even disgusted by their sex organs because they don't agree with their gender identity. Young homosexuals form a sexual orientation without even knowing what sex is and how to use their sex organs. The only function they know of it is for peeing. Pansexual people even reject the conventions of how we think these organs should be used. Then there are bigender, trigender, genderfluid, and genderless people too---all of whom have formed their sexual orientation transcending their penises or vaginas.
I stand by it. What you have down there won't mean d1ck when it comes to forming your sexual preference.
Let me see if you can actually grasp the idea. There are only 2 biological genders, Male and Female.
For the sake of clarity. There are two biological sexes. The gender continuum is is more than just two. Although gender is also used as a reference for biological sex, it is no longer accurate to refer to gender as defined by the genitals one is born with. That's why from the 90s onwards, application forms ask for your sex and not gender as what is the usual convention in the 80s and 70s. We should arrive at a consensus of terms to use.
If a male chooses to identify as a female, does he become homosexual? Not yet. Depending on culture and environment, the idea of what a female's identity/lifestyle will vary. Only when he becomes romantically attracted, sexually attracted and/or engage in sexual activity wiht another male does he become homosexual or he does a homosexual act.
The first bold sentence is not really that accurate. Check your facts. 70s pa yang definition na yan. And a very religious one too. Makes Christians and Muslims think they can reform a homosexual child just because he hasn't indulged in an abominable act just yet. The second one, i agree with because you have used the word "or". Yes, romantic interest is considered but not limited to the apparent sexual act.
A man can identify as a woman as early as before puberty usually between ages 8-10. And they can already be defined homosexual just because they have identified with a different gender and in turn, has become interested with people of his own sex. A homosexual can be considered a homosexual regardless if he has had homosexual intercourse (i.e. homosexual virgins, closet homosexuals in controlling environments) or if he is unable to engage in sex (impotent homosexuals, child homosexuals). Homosexuality starts just by identifying to a different gender and having the attitudes that goes with it.
Your understanding of the subject is antiquated. Am I talking to a 50 year old man?
Sexual preference is defined by which direction your sexual interest is homo, hetero or bi. Regardless of which, sexual activity will always involve genitalia. Sexual preference defines sexual activity. See? o di wala rin na naman yung punto mo?
A I have said: Sexual preference is just second fiddle and a consequence to/of your gender identity. One has to identify with a gender first before he can form a sexual preference. Yet the act need not be consummated to make one homosexual.
My point still stands.
Cop out. If a man has intercourse with a woman, it doesn't mean he is not gay or bisexual. True, It does say he had heterosexual intercourse, regardless of which gender both of them identify with.
Just so we're on the same page, homosexuality is homosexuality. A man identifying himself as a woman doesn't mean he is automatically homosexual.Unless that's what you have been thinking all along then ang babaw pala ng pseudo-scientific analytical na pagiisip mo. Only when he engages in homosexuality does it make him homosexual.
Engages in homosexuality, you mean as engaging in homosexual sex?
And what of prisoners who engage in man to man anal sex while still being straight? Prostitutes engaging in lesbian "shows" but are really straight? Transexual gay and lesbians engaging in heterosexual sex but are both gay and lesbian?
Again check updated information. It's far more complicated than that.
akala ko ba matalino ka? where did I say sexual preference is the same as gender identity and sex? or are you just being consistent as to twist what I say to mean something else just to win an argument? luma na yan
Call me Uncle Bob na lang, I called you Einstein first e. Einstein, you are confusing gender identity with gender role.
sabi ko na e. Gender identity and gender role is different. Sex (meaning intercourse) always involves genitals.
Refer to my first answer. You said people can choose their sex. Well, no. Not even close. And I never confused gender identity with gender role. Gender roles differ across societies and are conferred to you by your social group and are remotely of interest to the topic at hand.
Sure but its not just US Marines in Afghanistan that engage in this act. Lets say he has intercourse with just dogs and he prefers this sexual activity over straight, bi nor homosexual activity. A pure zoophiliac.
Zoophilacs don't identify their genders in reference to the animals they fvck. So what is the relation of that to homosexuality?
Lets throw that in the conversation so we can "progress" the way you want to progress
Huh? What progress? What way do I want to progress? Are you still on topic?
It is a whole different topic, yes. That is why I want to throw that in the conversation. Since you think progress means granting unconditional acceptance to gender identity, lets take that a step further and speed progress up a notch by starting discussions on Species Identity. Inter-species intercourse occurs in nature and is perfectly natural, how does that not differ from your arguments on homosexuality?
I for one don't believe in charters and contracts being unconditional. Meron pa ba niyan? Yes I grant homosexuals the same rights as you and I because they are human beings as you and I. Zoophilacs can be straight, homosexual, or bi in their gender identity. So they'll be granted the same rights as straights, bis, homosexuals and transexuals.
Now, if you think homosexuality is on equal or related terms with zoophilia just because they both appear in nature, you might want to read more books.
Well, we have seen your deficiency in comprehension and reason, I wouldn't trust your assessments let alone any of your recommendations.
Suuuuure. We have just seen how poor your arguments are based on the data you're exposed to, against that I would consider I have learned enough.
Man, if I had the money, I would put you back to school plus gender sensitivity workshops.
