So it's fair to compare a Toyota MR2 to an Enzo Ferrari ?
i hope i dont come off as a discussion crasher...
lets use that analogy...
person 1: A Toyota MR2 can perform equal to, if not better than an Enzo Ferrari. (WRONG)
person 2: Toyota, Given enough time would be able to make cars that perform like Ferraris
(PLAUSIBLE: given that ferraris have reached the top and could no longer improve)
person 3: I can only afford a Toyota MR2. A car is a car. it gets me to point a to point b nonetheless. I dont need a Ferrari to drive to work.
(OK argument. justifiable naman.)
person 4: You just want to get a ferrari to look cool and show off to everybody how big your.... garage is.
(WRONG. one should never assume what another thinks. no matter how airheaded you think they are. this is called sourgraping)
person 5: Ferraris are the best cars in the world. Among the supercars, i think that ferraris smoke them all. even meager attempts by Toyota wont come close to Ferraris.
(OPINION: you dont argue against opinion. you discuss differences, not shove each others opinions down the others throat. in this analogy, tama naman e.)
person 6: You have a ferrari but you dont drive competitively. youre not worthy of a ferrari. your driving sucks. theres a vid of you on youtube showing off your ugly driving skills.
(SOURGRAPING)
well at least thats how i see it.