I didn't say it was a definite reference.
Now, why would even someone refer to something that's not definite? But since the scale is (not definite), I don't think people should look at it as a guide or basis for identifying or classifying one's sexual behavior or status. Numbers 1-5 are, in fact, irrelevant or of no use, at all. If you're straight, you're straight. If you're gay, then you're gay. That simple.
Because there are hundreds of scales like that that exists. And they say the same things. This is just the simplest example. It is an illustrarion of human sexual behavior relating to their sexual orientation. If you are straight you are straight, agree, grade 0 exists. but there are straights who have same sex incidence 1, and 2.
Baloney! Any man who "can" engage in same sex intercourse is absolutely gay. They cannot identify themselves as straight. That just doesn't make any sense. It's either they deny being gay or they completely lie about it.
But they exist. Find someone like that, and tell it to themselves, Baloney! Andami sex behavior research dito sa Pilipinas.
We can even hit the survey route for this if you want and we don't even have to go too far. We can conduct that here on PM. You'll be hard-pressed proving your claim, I tell yah.
Agree. I'd be hard pressed here to prove my point lalo na thread pa lang na ito heterosexIST na ang tono. May gay thread na ininvite maglabasan mga gay, wala lumabas. What do you expect? lol
It's not that simple folks.
It is to me. Or shall I say, to a vast majority?
Yes. It seems THAT simple to a vast majority. Kita naman dito. Lalo na kung kulang sa info.
ang dali lang ng sinasabi ko.
homosexuality is the sexual orientation of homosexuals.
homsexual sex, is just that--- homosexual sex, not indicative of an individual's sexual orientation.
gamitin mo nalang utak mo kung accurate ba, may merit o logical yang dalawang statements mo.
hahaha...takot kang ma-quote no? because your doctrines imply ridiculousness underneath the science you use to cover-up the inconclusiveness of the claims you propagate as facts.
we live in a world where homosexuality is also defined as a sexual act (romantic, attraction, etc.. and not just intercourse). therefore, homosexual sex is definitely homosexuality. therefore homosexuality can be chosen, pseudo-scientific bigotry aside.
We call your question a semantic landmine. Mixing two definitions in 2 clauses in a sentence. Kaya hindi ko ininduldge. I have always stuck with the definition of homosexuality as a sexual orientation- a state of being. Ang isang homosexual, hindi naman niya napipili ang sexual orientation niya na homosexuality regardless if they can choose to engage or suppress their need for homosexual sex.
I was born a lesbian, but I think I'm beginning to identify as a supersexual*. (If people can come up with their own terms on gender identity and some regard them to be true, why can't I)
*Supersexual - a male or female identifying as a gender that attracts multiple persons of the opposite sex at the same time and makes the same amount of persons from the same sex envious. sometimes also called as alphasexual.
Good luck on your sexual journey.
just curious, how about those people doing it just for the money? gay or not?
but come to think of it, if they enjoy doing it (the deed) they gotta be gay...right?
same thing. they can either identify as straight or bisexual. many girls who go through high school lesbian encounters either identify as straight, bisexual or lesbian---regardless if they enjoyed the act or not. the possibilities are endless. human sexual behavior is an interesting point of study.